Fake engagement and incentivized reviews
What Google prohibits
Google prohibits reviews that do not come from a genuine customer experience. That covers reviews bought or sold, reviews traded for a discount, a gift card, or a free product, reviews posted by accounts created to inflate or deflate a rating, and coordinated posting designed to move a score. The rule is about the origin of the review, not its tone: a glowing fake breaches it exactly as a one-star fake does.
Evidence that carries the case
Reviewer account history, absence from your customer and transaction records, timing clusters across unrelated businesses.
Typical timeline
Most complete in 1 to 3 business days. Cases that need pattern evidence across multiple accounts can take up to 7.
Conflict of interest
What Google prohibits
Google prohibits reviews from anyone with a stake in the rating. That means competitors, current and former employees posting as customers, owners reviewing their own business, and anyone paid to post. The reviewer does not have to be lying for this to apply. A former employee describing something that genuinely happened still has the conflict, and the conflict is the violation.
Evidence that carries the case
Employment records, account cross-references to a competing business, review history showing a pattern of targeting one category.
Typical timeline
Most complete in 1 to 3 business days. Cases that need pattern evidence across multiple accounts can take up to 7.
Spam and off-topic content
What Google prohibits
Google prohibits content that is not about a customer experience at this business: advertising, links, the same text repeated across listings, and commentary about politics, a news story, or a social issue rather than the service received. This is the category most often misfiled, because a review can be furious and still be on topic, or perfectly polite and entirely off it.
Evidence that carries the case
The review text itself, plus duplicate-text matches on other listings.
Typical timeline
Most complete in 1 to 3 business days. Cases that need pattern evidence across multiple accounts can take up to 7.
Harassment and hate speech
What Google prohibits
Google prohibits personal attacks on named individuals, threats, slurs, and sustained targeting of a person rather than a description of the service. Naming a member of staff is not automatically a breach. Naming them in order to attack them is.
Evidence that carries the case
The review text, related reviews from the same account, and any documented history between the reviewer and the business.
Typical timeline
Most complete in 1 to 3 business days. Cases that need pattern evidence across multiple accounts can take up to 7.
Mistaken business identity
What Google prohibits
Google prohibits reviews left on the wrong listing. In practice this is a review describing a business with a similar name, a prior tenant at your address, a different branch of the same franchise, or a third party such as a delivery platform or an insurer. This is the most reliably removable category on the list, because the mismatch is usually visible in the review text itself.
Evidence that carries the case
Business records, address and tenancy history, and the details inside the review that do not match your operation.
Typical timeline
Most complete in 1 to 3 business days. Cases that need pattern evidence across multiple accounts can take up to 7.
Illegal and legally restricted content
What Google prohibits
Google prohibits content that is unlawful or restricted outright: extortion demands, disclosure of personal or confidential information, and other material that breaches the law rather than only the content policy. Where a review carries an explicit demand for money to take it down, that is extortion and it is handled as such.
Evidence that carries the case
Screenshots of the demand or the surrounding communications, plus the offending content itself.
Typical timeline
Most complete in 1 to 3 business days. Cases that need pattern evidence across multiple accounts can take up to 7.